Indicative initial-submission timelines
The table below retains the planning information from the original website, edited for clarity. Timelines are indicative and must be reconfirmed against the current regulation, authority practice and individual study pathway before they are used for planning.
| Country / review | Medicinal products | Medical devices | Planning note |
|---|
| Georgia — local ethics committee | 3–4 weeks | 3–4 weeks | Ethics approval is included in the national regulatory submission package. |
|---|
| Georgia — regulatory authority | 21 working days for review, plus up to 15 working days for query responses | 21 working days for review, plus up to 15 working days for query responses | Confirm the current pathway and document sequence for the individual study. |
|---|
| Latvia — ethics/regulatory review | CTIS procedure: validation and assessment periods apply; the original planning estimate stated a maximum of 106 days including queries | Approximately one month in the original planning estimate, excluding clock stops for questions | Medicinal-product submissions use CTIS. Medical-device pathways and timelines depend on study classification. |
|---|
| Ukraine — ethics committee | Approximately 4 weeks | Approximately 4 weeks | Regulatory, operational and safety feasibility must be reconfirmed before planning. |
|---|
| Ukraine — regulatory authority | Approximately one month plus query time | Approximately two weeks plus query time | Regulatory, operational and safety feasibility must be reconfirmed before planning. |
|---|
| Poland — ethics/regulatory review | CTIS procedure; the original planning estimate stated up to 106 days including queries | Approximately one month plus query time | Medicinal-product submissions use CTIS. Medical-device timelines depend on the study pathway. |
|---|